Uncategorized

  • Legal Briefs and Dramatic Beats:

    Structuring a Closing Argument Like a One-Act Play The difference between a good closing argument and a forgettable one is the same difference between a standing ovation and a bored cough in row B: structure. Not evidence. Not emotion.Structure. Because whether you’re pleading for justice or staging a one-act in a black box theatre with three…

    Read more →

  • If Plato Watched Love Island

    A philosophical inquiry into fake tan, fire pits, and the fever dream of televised desire. By Brian S. Brijbag, Esq. It’s not that Plato would have liked Love Island.It’s that he would have understood it.Because beneath the veneers of lip filler and neon mesh lies an eternal truth: We do not love the person – we love being chosen…

    Read more →

  • Things My Coffee Cup Knows That I Don’t

    A love letter to the ceramic accomplice of my delusions This is not just a coffee cup. This is a trauma archive with a handle. This is the silent witness to my morning bargaining: “If I just make it to lunch without combusting, I can have another one.” This is the thing I raise like…

    Read more →

  • Poetry Written Entirely in Legal Footnotes

    Where the citations weep, and the subtext sues for emotional damages This is not a poem. Not in the traditional sense. There is no meter here, no rhyme, no stanzas. Just a body of text so plain, so devoid of soul, it could’ve been written by the IRS. And yet – beneath it – buried…

    Read more →

  • Emotional Damages in Section 210: Can You Sue for Public Humiliation at a Coldplay Concert?

    A Legal Meditation on Infidelity, Stadium Screens, and the Dumbest Way to Get Caught Section 210, Allegiant Stadium.A Coldplay concert.Two adults – married, but not to each other – caught mid-affair on the kiss cam, smiling like co-conspirators who thought the jumbo screen was just a rumor. He’s a CEO.She’s the HR Director.And their side quest just got turned…

    Read more →

  • In Praise of Contradictions: Wearing a Tie, Quoting Foucault

    A meditation on holding professional gravity and creative chaos in the same breath I wore a tie to a deposition this morning and quoted Foucault to my kid at lunch. Both acts felt subversive. Let’s begin with the obvious: contradiction is not a flaw in the system. It is the system. I’m a trial lawyer who writes…

    Read more →

  • Justice Isn’t a Feeling – It’s a Filing Deadline

    Justice gets great press. Poets call it divine. Statues hold it blindfolded. Protesters chant for it. Superheroes allegedly fight for it, though you’ll notice none of them ever have to argue a motion to compel. But here’s the truth that makes law students twitch and philosophers sigh:Justice isn’t a feeling. It’s a filing deadline. It’s…

    Read more →

  • The Fireworks Are Just the Opening Statement

    By Brian S. Brijbag, Esq. Let’s be honest. The Fourth of July isn’t about hot dogs or flags or whatever color bomb Pop Rocks your aunt duct-taped to the backyard fence. It’s not even about freedom in that vague bumper-sticker way we toss around like lawn darts after a few beers. The Fourth of July…

    Read more →

  • Closing Arguments and Cultural Rituals

    Why attorneys and shamans both use rhythm, repetition, and robes – and who does it better. Let’s start with the robes. Because if you’re going to call upon unseen forces, you might as well dress for the occasion. Attorneys and shamans, on the surface, have little in common. One files motions. The other smokes them.…

    Read more →

  • Why I Trust a Theater Kid Over an MBA

    One knows the power of silence. The other interrupts it with a spreadsheet. I’ve worked with both. I’ve sat in rooms with freshly pressed suits and PowerPoint decks loaded with action items, quarterly projections, and slides titled things like “Growth Levers.” I’ve also been in green rooms with theater kids covered in stage makeup, drinking…

    Read more →